The definition of “fodder” in the US is “any vegetable, fruit, vegetable matter, or seed,” but in Australia it’s “any edible plant, plant part, plant substance, plant structure, or plant matter.”
This is because in the United States, it is not technically an edible plant.
So the government is using that definition to limit the range of things that can be used to feed animals, as well as people, and therefore is using a definition that makes no sense at all.
The article also talks about the fact that this new definition doesn’t actually cover the food that the machines eat.
It doesn’t cover the seeds that the seeds are supposed to germinate in, nor the fruits that they are supposed “produce”.
The article goes on to say that it is “the Food Safety and Standards Authority’s position that the definition of ‘fodder’ is too broad to allow safe food for animals and people.”
In a response to this, the FASA said that “a number of important aspects of the definition are not reflected in the current definition.
For example, it does not consider that the food could be produced in a home environment.”
It also pointed out that the word “fruits” in “fruit” has a wider meaning than it does in the definition.
And as it says in its response, it has the right to decide what definitions are appropriate and what are not.
This is why there are so many exemptions to the food safety laws in Australia.
There are also some people who use food for medicinal purposes, and some people, like veterinarians and animal welfare organisations, don’t want the use of the food to be restricted, so they are looking for exemptions to food safety rules.
But these exemptions are rarely granted, and the Food Standards Authority says that the rules should not be limited to food for humans.
In response to the FSA’s concerns, the government said that it would be reviewing the definition, but it hasn’t made a final decision yet.
And it will continue to listen to what Australians have to say about the new definition, and will make further changes if necessary.
This story originally appeared on The Conversation.